A Case Series Exploration of Multi-Regional Expression Heterogeneity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Extensive intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is believed to contribute to therapeutic failure and tumor recurrence, as treatment-resistant cell clones can survive and expand. However, little is known about ITH in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) because of the limited number of single-cell sequencing studies on TNBC. In this study, we explored ITH in TNBC by evaluating gene expression-derived and imaging-derived multi-region differences within the same tumor. We obtained tissue specimens from 10 TNBC patients and conducted RNA sequencing analysis of 2-4 regions per tumor. We developed a novel analysis framework to dissect and characterize different types of variability: between-patients (inter-tumoral heterogeneity), between-patients across regions (inter-tumoral and region heterogeneity), and within-patient, between-regions (regional intratumoral heterogeneity). We performed a Bayesian changepoint analysis to assess and classify regional variability as low (convergent) versus high (divergent) within each patient feature (TNBC and PAM50 subtypes, immune, stroma, tumor counts and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes). Gene expression signatures were categorized into three types of variability: between-patients (108 genes), between-patients across regions (183 genes), and within-patients, between-regions (778 genes). Based on the between-patient gene signature, we identified two distinct patient clusters that differed in menopausal status. Significant intratumoral divergence was observed for PAM50 classification, tumor cell counts, and tumor-infiltrating T cell abundance. Other features examined showed a representation of both divergent and convergent results. Lymph node stage was significantly associated with divergent tumors. Our results show extensive intertumoral heterogeneity and regional ITH in gene expression and image-derived features in TNBC. Our findings also raise concerns regarding gene expression based TNBC subtyping. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the role of regional heterogeneity in TNBC as a driver of treatment resistance.

Effect of boron compounds on the biological effectiveness of proton therapy.

PURPOSE: We assessed whether adding sodium borocaptate (BSH) or 4-borono-l-phenylalanine (BPA) to cells irradiated with proton beams influenced the biological effectiveness of those beams against prostate cancer cells to investigate if the alpha particles generated through proton-boron nuclear reactions would be sufficient to enhance the biological effectiveness of the proton beams. METHODS: We measured clonogenic survival in DU145 cells treated with 80.4-ppm BSH or 86.9-ppm BPA, or their respective vehicles, after irradiation with 6-MV X-rays, 1.2-keV/µm (low linear energy transfer [LET]) protons, or 9.9-keV/µm (high-LET) protons. We also measured γH2AX and 53BP1 foci in treated cells at 1 and 24 h after irradiation with the same conditions. RESULTS: We found that BSH radiosensitized DU145 cells across all radiation types. However, no difference was found in relative radiosensitization, characterized by the sensitization enhancement ratio or the relative biological effectiveness, for vehicle- versus BSH-treated cells. No differences were found in numbers of γH2AX or 53BP1 foci or γH2AX/53BP1 colocalized foci for vehicle- versus BSH-treated cells across radiation types. BPA did not radiosensitize DU145 cells nor induced any significant differences when comparing vehicle- versus BPA-treated cells for clonogenic cell survival or γH2AX and 53BP1 foci or γH2AX/53BP1 colocalized foci. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 11 B, at concentrations of 80.4 ppm from BSH or 86.9 ppm from BPA, had no effect on the biological effectiveness of proton beams in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Our results agree with published theoretical calculations indicating that the contribution of alpha particles from such reactions to the total absorbed dose and biological effectiveness is negligible. We also found that BSH radiosensitized DU145 cells to X-rays, low-LET protons, and high-LET protons but that the radiosensitization was not related to DNA damage.